Matrix theory
7 research manuscripts in mathematics. Catalogue areas: Matrix theory.
Results in Matrix theory
- Selected result:
Matrix-pencil rank distance as an explicit completion problem
ProvedDodig–Stošić conjecture on bounded rank perturbations of matrix pencils
Over any infinite field, pencils A, B have δ(A,B) ≤ x exactly when K_{c,d}(A) is a constant full-rank compression of K_{c,d}(B) ⊕ (t − d)I_x; a cited linearization theorem then gives Conjecture 1 over algebraically closed fields.
Manuscript: Matrix-pencil rank distance as an explicit completion problemLean proof: Matrix-pencil rank distance as an explicit completion problemVerification: Matrix-pencil rank distance as an explicit completion problem
- Selected result:
Counterexamples to the Kronecker-square lower bound for nonnegative rank
DisprovedVandaele–Gillis–Glineur–Tuyttens conjecture rank₊(M ⊗ M) ≥ rank₊(M) rank(M)
For every k ≥ 0 an explicit rational nonnegative matrix C of order k + 11, rank k + 10 and nonnegative rank k + 11 has rank₊(C ⊗ C) ≤ (k + 10)² + 9, at least k + 1 below the conjectured bound rank₊(C) rank(C).
Manuscript: Counterexamples to the Kronecker-square lower bound for nonnegative rankLean proof: Counterexamples to the Kronecker-square lower bound for nonnegative rankVerification: Counterexamples to the Kronecker-square lower bound for nonnegative rank
- Selected result:
Finite real counterexamples and spectral obstructions for q-permanent monotonicity
Disproved for real symmetric positive-definite matricesReal-symmetric case of the Bapat–Lal q-permanent monotonicity conjecture on [−1,1]
An explicit integer positive-definite matrix of order 896 has a q-permanent that strictly decreases between two explicit rationals in (0,1); counterexamples exist in every order N ≥ 896.
Manuscript: Finite real counterexamples and spectral obstructions for q-permanent monotonicityLean proof: Finite real counterexamples and spectral obstructions for q-permanent monotonicityVerification: Finite real counterexamples and spectral obstructions for q-permanent monotonicity
Gyires's permanent inequality for structured matrices
Partially resolvedGyires's permanent inequality for doubly stochastic matrices (Cheon–Wanless Conjecture 20)
Proves Gyires's permanent inequality for nonnegative circulants of orders 5, 6 and 7, permutation polynomials aI+bQ+cQ² and four-block matrices in all orders, one-exceptional-column/row matrices, and rank ≤ 2 through order 15.
Manuscript: Gyires's permanent inequality for structured matricesLean proof: Gyires's permanent inequality for structured matricesVerification: Gyires's permanent inequality for structured matrices
Real positive-definite counterexamples to extended q-permanent monotonicity
DisprovedDa Fonseca's q-permanent (μ-permanent) monotonicity conjecture
A real symmetric positive-definite 5×5 matrix has q-permanent 8,968,822,249 at q = 14 and 7,441,960,000 at q = 15; for each real q₀ > 1 a positive-definite matrix (size depending on q₀) has negative derivative at q₀.
Manuscript: Real positive-definite counterexamples to extended q-permanent monotonicityLean proof: Real positive-definite counterexamples to extended q-permanent monotonicityVerification: Real positive-definite counterexamples to extended q-permanent monotonicity
An unbounded obstruction to projection AM–GM in Loewner order
CounterexampleProjection AM–GM inequality in Loewner order for symmetrized products of projections
Three rational rank-one orthogonal projections in ℝ³ have symmetrized product G ⋠ M³, M their mean (quadratic form −8/243), and for every real C some such triple with positive-definite mean has G ⋠ C·M³.
Manuscript: An unbounded obstruction to projection AM–GM in Loewner orderLean proof: An unbounded obstruction to projection AM–GM in Loewner orderVerification: An unbounded obstruction to projection AM–GM in Loewner order
A polygon enclosure fails for sums of normal matrices
CounterexampleKovačec's polygon enclosure conjecture for determinants of sums of normal matrices
Normal 3×3 matrices with spectra (0, 1, i) and (−1−i, 1, −1+i) give det(A+B) = 2/3 + 2i/9, outside every bounded component closure of ℂ∖Γ, Γ the exterior boundary of the transposition graph, yet inside the permutation-value hull.
Manuscript: A polygon enclosure fails for sums of normal matricesLean proof: A polygon enclosure fails for sums of normal matricesVerification: A polygon enclosure fails for sums of normal matrices
Other subjects
Discrete analysis, tilings, probability and entropyOptimizationQuantum informationValuation theoryMatroid theorySampling algorithms and information theoryGraph theory and graph polynomialsInteger sequences and combinatoricsFinite geometryQuadratic forms and number theoryBoolean functions and decision treesInequalities and real analysisProof complexityFair divisionStochastic thermodynamics